Iucn red list assessment
5
Red List CategoryLC
Least Concern
Red List Criteria
Version3.1
Year Assessed2012
Assessor/sBirdLife International
Reviewer/sButchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor/sJustificationThis species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population trend appears to be increasing, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
History
-
Least Concern (LC)
-
Least Concern (LC)
-
Least Concern (LC)
-
Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
-
Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
-
Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
Sources and Credits
- (c) felixerhard, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC), uploaded by felixerhard
- (c) Carmelo López Abad, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC), uploaded by Carmelo López Abad
- (c) Dr. Vijay Anand Ismavel MS MCh, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC-SA),
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7308/9998587664_2bbaff7ae9_o.jpg
- (c) Dr. Vijay Anand Ismavel MS MCh, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC-SA),
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7322/9998559084_85fb95f8f6_o.jpg
- (c) International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC-SA),
http://eol.org/data_objects/34570721
More Info