The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
-
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
- the observation has a date
- the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
- the observation has a photo
Observatio
Comments & Identifications
I merged Pyrobombus pratorum into Bombus pratorum, since Pyrobombus seems to be a subgenus. If Pyrobombus has been recently elevated to the genus level, please provide a reference and I'll change it back.
I think you are right, but the system didn´t find Bombus pratorum but Pyrobombus pratorum, so I chose this one.
Add a comment
Add an identification