If anyone else looks at this, Loarie isn't mistaking an ensatina for a RS Newt. I sleepily switched the pictures. I nearly did the same a minute ago, only between an American Kestrel and Miner's Lettuce. Really, those two are quite distinct from one another.
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
iNaturalist.org shares licensed observation data with
several data partners so your data can be more accessible to
scientists and other researchers.
If you'd like us to share your observations with data partners, make
sure you've chosen to license your observations with a Creative
Commons license.
External Links
This observation has been incorporated into the following external websites:
some rights reserved
Comments & Identifications
I'm falling asleep as I type this. It's pathetic, really.
If anyone else looks at this, Loarie isn't mistaking an ensatina for a RS Newt. I sleepily switched the pictures. I nearly did the same a minute ago, only between an American Kestrel and Miner's Lettuce. Really, those two are quite distinct from one another.
thats more like it!
I've really got to start doing this sort of thing earlier in the evening...
Add a comment
Add an identification