Everyone can see the coordinates unless the taxon is threatened.
Obscured
Public coordinates shown as a random point within 10KM of the true coordinates. True coordinates are only visible to you and the curators of projects to which you add the observation.
private
Coordinates completely hidden from public maps, true coordinates only visible to you and the curators of projects to which you add the observation. Observations with private coordinates will still be used to verify place check lists.
Description
Nobody seems to bother with these common roadside species, but I think they're lovely. Anyway, somebody's got to submit them to the Field Guide group!
The bright green leaves in the background are ferns, but the dark green feathery one at the top right is the yarrow.
Thanks for your note. Hmm, looks like a complicated question. Newcomb's just lists it as introduced. PLANTS, however, lists several subspecies, some native but the nominate not -- and those divisions are themselves not recognized by all authorities. I assume it's not possible to tell which this is (don't think I have macros of the stem, leaves etc, even if that would help). Maybe I should remove it from Introduced Species project ...
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
iNaturalist.org shares licensed observation data with
several data partners so your data can be more accessible to
scientists and other researchers.
If you'd like us to share your observations with data partners, make
sure you've chosen to license your observations with a Creative
Commons license.
External Links
This observation has been incorporated into the following external websites:
some rights reserved
Comments & Identifications
I think this is actually native to eastern North America, is it not? It just seems introduced because it is a ruderal and likes disturbance..
Thanks for your note. Hmm, looks like a complicated question. Newcomb's just lists it as introduced. PLANTS, however, lists several subspecies, some native but the nominate not -- and those divisions are themselves not recognized by all authorities. I assume it's not possible to tell which this is (don't think I have macros of the stem, leaves etc, even if that would help). Maybe I should remove it from Introduced Species project ...
Add a comment
Add an identification