Everyone can see the coordinates unless the taxon is threatened.
Obscured
Public coordinates shown as a random point within 10KM of the true coordinates. True coordinates are only visible to you and the curators of projects to which you add the observation.
private
Coordinates completely hidden from public maps, true coordinates only visible to you and the curators of projects to which you add the observation. Observations with private coordinates will still be used to verify place check lists.
Description
I tried to identify this one but I couldn't even find the right family. . . It has distinctive comb like hairs on its front tibia.
I considered that possibility, but this guy was maybe 2 and a half to 3 cm from front to back legs, which is HUGE for most jumping spiders. It also didn't have the large orb-like front eyes that are characteristic of them. . . still I could be wrong.
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
some rights reserved
Comments & Identifications
Neat! How big was this guy? It sort of looks like a jumping spider, but I'm not at all certain.
I considered that possibility, but this guy was maybe 2 and a half to 3 cm from front to back legs, which is HUGE for most jumping spiders. It also didn't have the large orb-like front eyes that are characteristic of them. . . still I could be wrong.
Add a comment
Add an identification