Originally thought Trichostema parishii, but it didn't have the long inflorescences that I've generally been seeing in pics of that species. Thanks to Charlie for the ID! It was a low but good-sized bush -- probably close to a meter high, closer to twice that wide (growth habit shot below). Unfortunately my only shots were badly overexposed, but there's one flower, in shadow, on which you can see the petal patterning.
|Photos or sounds?||Yes|
|Is the organism wild/naturalized?||Unknown|
|Does the location seem accurate?||Unknown|
|Does the date seem accurate?||Unknown|
If you think this observation is inaccurate, please add an ID, participate in the quality assessment above, or describe the inaccuracy in a comment.