Hi @jpsilva.
Are you sure about this?
According to WoRMS, Dendrodoris krusensternii (Gray, 1850) is not a New Zealand species, but Dendrodoris denisoni (Angas, 1864) is.
I can see that Doris denisoni Angas, 1864 is listed as a junior synonym of D.krusensternii, but it is also listed as the original name of D.denisoni.
Can you please explain this - I don't understand what is going on there.
Regards,
Peter
You're right, it has been recovered as a valid species a few months after this commit. At that time it was considered a junior and invalid synonym of D. krusensternii. I'll split them as soon as I find some spare time.
Just check the distributions and references for both species on WoRMS. However, I think we still haven't heard the last on this and future molecular studies will most likely introduce changes.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Hi @jpsilva.
Are you sure about this?
According to WoRMS, Dendrodoris krusensternii (Gray, 1850) is not a New Zealand species, but Dendrodoris denisoni (Angas, 1864) is.
I can see that Doris denisoni Angas, 1864 is listed as a junior synonym of D.krusensternii, but it is also listed as the original name of D.denisoni.
Can you please explain this - I don't understand what is going on there.
Regards,
Peter