Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Charina. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Charina bottae 32104
Rodríguez elevated the southern population to species status (Charina umbratica), snakes north of Los Angeles are still Charina bottae which includes all current iNat observations
Rodríguez-Robles, J. A., G. R. Stewart, and T. J. Papenfuss. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA-based phylogeography of North American Rubber Boas, Charina bottae (Serpentes: Boidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18(2):227-237 (Link)
Weird, the map in Rodríguez-Robles et al. would suggest C. bottae. This came up in a demo during my workshop today, so the attendees got an unasked for dive in the horrifying world of taxon changes.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Could you clarify? What exactly does "north of Los Angles mean? What about snakes in the Transverse Ranges?