Johnson et al. list this as one of the "hypothesized members" of Ardeadoris in table S2. I don't really know why that means the name should officially change, but WoRMS seems to go with it: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=597323. If someone can enlighten me as to how this adheres to ICZN rules (Rebecca?), please cure me of my ignorance.
Johnson RF, Gosliner TM (2012) Traditional Taxonomic Groupings Mask Evolutionary History: A Molecular Phylogeny and New Classification of the Chromodorid Nudibranchs. PLoS ONE 7(4): e33479. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033479 (Link)
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.