For the future, we actually try to follow Calflora for California plants, not Jepson, and they still treat this as Chamaesyce. Let's just leave this one for now. All our authorities are listed at http://www.inaturalist.org/pages/curator+guide#policies
Now that Jepson updates dynamically and not with every publication of the paper edition, Calflora generally lags behind them, and I'm not sure what their schedule is. However, as a general proponent of a slower rate of taxonomic change, I actually see that as an advantage of Calflora.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
For the future, we actually try to follow Calflora for California plants, not Jepson, and they still treat this as Chamaesyce. Let's just leave this one for now. All our authorities are listed at http://www.inaturalist.org/pages/curator+guide#policies