Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
bouteloua loarie roadside gaura (Gaura suffulta)

should this be split into O. suffulta+O. nealleyi OR just merged into O. suffulta?

Sep. 1, 2018 17:09:12 +0000 bouteloua

committed taxon split --grimace emoji while she waits to see if she did it wrong--

Comments

@nathantaylor7583 @sambiology

Posted by bouteloua over 5 years ago

Although I've always called these Gaura suffulta in the past, it sure looks like the accepted name should be Oenothera nealleyi:
http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77133597-1#synonyms

I can't seem to find Oenothera suffulta as an accepted name on POWO...

Posted by sambiology over 5 years ago

here's the one for O. suffulta
http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77092962-1

see Wagner et al. 2013 on the split:

Trans-Pecos Texas and northern Coahuila, Mexico, north to Bernalillo and Torrance counties, New Mexico, in washes and other sandy places, grasslands, and extending to pinyon-juniper woodlands; 1220–2140 m. Raven and Gregory (1972) considered Oenothera nealleyi to represent an unevenly intergrading entity with Oenothera suffulta based on geographical merging of some of the characteristics that distinguish them and because the entity from Terrell County, Texas, described as Gaura suffulta var. terrellensis Munz has a combination of characteristics of the two taxa. The origin of these plants from Terrell County should be further explored. For now we here continue to include this name in the synonymy of Oenothera nealleyi. The molecular data (Krakos 2011; unpubl.) suggest that Oenothera nealleyi is not as closely related to Oenothera suffulta as suggested by Raven and Gregory (1972), given the placement in the phylogeny and the difference in scent profiles for these two taxa. Oenothera suffulta is a member of a strongly supported clade (Fig. 1) consisting of it along with Oenothera triangulata and Oenothera patriciae, while Oenothera nealleyi is a member of a polytomy that consists of other species of subsect. Gaura, with the Oenothera suffulta - Oenothera triangulata - Oenothera patriciae clade sister to it. Oenothera nealleyi has a strong sweet scent, characterized by benzaldehyde (almond), cinnamaldehyde, cinnamic alcohol (cinnamon), methyl salicylate and its methyl ether (wintergreen), neral and geranial (citronella), and nerol and geraniol (lemon) (R. Raguso, pers. comm.), whereas Oenothera suffulta does not have a discernible scent. This difference in scent probably plays a key role in the pollination syndromes for these species.

I guess my question is should we bother splitting it here on iNaturalist? Or should we just merge Gaura suffulta into O. suffulta? Wagner 2013 doesn't comment on how common O. nealleyi is, i.e. what percentage of Gaura/Oenothera suffulta (sensu stricto) observations on iNat could actually be O. nealleyi?

Posted by bouteloua over 5 years ago

Ah -- good research, cassi.

In this case, I think it would be appropriate to have the two taxa: Oenothera suffulta and O. nealleyi.

I can't wait until we can use "scratch and sniff" on images on the internet! :)

Posted by sambiology over 5 years ago

Powell's new book will accept O. nealleyi at the species level, which is good enough for me. In Texas, it is apparently confined to but widespread in the Trans-Pecos region. Not sure outside of Texas, though.

Posted by nathantaylor over 5 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments