Flag for Taxon: Genus Tecomaria
| Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bouteloua | Genus Tecomaria |
treated as Tecoma in POWO, please discuss before swapping |
Sep. 3, 2018 01:14:28 +0000 | loarie |
see comments |
Comments
Yes, as I understand from Tony's research, Tecomaria should be conserved for the African species, T. capensis and T. nyassae.
here's a deviation https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_framework_relationships/179678
also see these associated flags
https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/273517
https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/273520
Letter from POWO:
Thanks Tony,
I will change that. Lucia Lohmann normally gives us feedback on any changes in Bignoniaceae but she must have missed that. Don’t like these kind of papers where all the important information is hidden in running text.
Best wishes,
Rafaël
From: Tony Rebelo T.Rebelo@sanbi.org.za
Sent: 01 April 2020 07:26
Subject: Tecoma capensis vs Tecomaria capensis
Hi
Can this please be reviewed: Tecomaria capensis is not a Tecoma – more closely related to Podranea:
In error: http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:111129-1
Source: https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/273517
Reference: Richard G. Olmstead, Michelle L. Zjhra,7 L ú cia G. Lohmann, Susan O. Grose, 2\ and Andrew J. Eckert A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF BIGNONIACEAE. American Journal of Botany 96(9): 1731–1743. 2009.
Unless I am missing something.
Thanks Tony,
Given the comments and links listed here, looks like we should add this as a proposed deviation from Plants of the World Online, yes?
@tonyrebelo @marcoschmidtffm @stevejones @outramps-tanniedi
http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:4266-1