Flag for Photo 87942138
spam and copyright
infringement flags only if the content is not spam or not an
infringement of copyright, respectively.
| Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ericingham | Local photo 87942138 by (c) anonymous, some rights reserved (CC BY-SA) |
copyright infringement |
Sep. 8, 2020 14:36:07 +0000 | tiwane |
Not copyright infringement. |
Comments
Peculiar. The file seems to still have the erroneous copyright notice on it despite resolution of the flag. This shouldn't still be in the system if resolved. Might be related to a known bug, though the original issue seems to have been fixed…
I wonder if the fact that it's an external photo (wikimedia) matters at all here?
That's something I was wondering, or if it's due to how the file synch with Wikipedia works. One of the other mis-flagged photos was also an external file, from Flickr, though it seems to have been restored properly (https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/3057263).
I think I'll ask about re-opening that forum post; seems like that might be better than starting a new one.
These seem affected too (external photo, resolved):
https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/10309954
https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/495593
They aren't Flickr hosted, but they aren't wikimedia either (both are from Google Streets)
This was directly linked to wikipedia, so I don't think this one counts as copyright infringement. It was not a user uploaded observation as far as I can tell, but that someone chose to pull images from wiki for the header images of the species. You can just change out the header images if you don't want wikipedia/flickr import images to show