Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
tonyrebelo Rough Falsepea (Polygala scabra)

changes needed

Jul. 8, 2021 12:37:48 +0000 loarie

see comments

Comments

see https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85930953
details here: http://opus.sanbi.org/bitstream/20.500.12143/7573/1/Bothalia43_2_2013.pdf

This needs two steps:

a taxonomy swap :: P scabra must go to P. affinis (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/913976-Polygala-affinis) = this is the concept being used currently on iNat.

Polygala scabra (of a different concept) needs to be created. Note that the paper differs from POWO: POWO sinks this to P. bowkerii, but BODATSA and the paper prefer to keep it as an undefined (unplaced) entity.
I am unconvinced by us adding this concept to iNaturalist, as in theory it is not possible to add any specimens/observations to this name on iNat because it is undetermined and thus cannot be identified as such with any reliability. Strictly, I would have thought that if P. scabra was P. bowkerii then the priority name would be P. scabra, and P. bowkeri would be the synonym?

@loarie - can this be done please.

Posted by tonyrebelo almost 3 years ago

any chance you can try to get POWO to make the change on your end and we follow POWO for now?

Posted by loarie over 2 years ago

POWO is not our end - that is KEW. We have BODATSA.
POWO follows basinyms, not incorrect use.

So what is valid is that what we are calling P. scabra on iNaturalist (and southern Africa) is P. affinis and the swap needs to be made.

Drop the P. scabra that is indeterminate. If POWO makes it a synonym of P. bowkeri that is irrelevant as it is a different concept and not in use anyway. It is purely a taxonomical issue with no relevance to iNaturalist (because no one knows what the plants look like and therefore cannot make or have made any IDs of it).

Posted by tonyrebelo over 2 years ago

But to quote from the butterfly example:
we have two names for the same thing on iNaturalist:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/568656-Polygala-scabra is the same thing as https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/913976-Polygala-affinis

The two need to be merged. P. scabra is redundant. P. affinis is the name in use
POWO recognizes P. affinis: http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:690993-1

So all the observations that are P. scabra need to be renamed P. affinis

I dont care what we do with the POWO name P. scabra - ignore it. But we need it as a synonym on iNat for people using the old field guides with the name P. scabra for P. affinis (it is there already).

Posted by tonyrebelo over 2 years ago

OK I swapped scabra into affinis https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/95372
but lets hold off on separating scabra from Polygala bowkerae if thats ok

Posted by loarie over 2 years ago

Perfect by me. Thanks.

Posted by tonyrebelo over 2 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments