February 01, 2020

Rubus spp (of Texas) comparison of features


Thank you for your interest in brambles and referencing this journal post. Due to the growing effort to further complicate Rubus by adding hundreds of complex species to the iNat database instead of taking the condensed species route like Flora of North America, I have ended my participation in ID'ing Rubus observations. The 3 posts I made will remain online for anyone that cares to reference them.




This post is Part 3 of my series on Rubus species in Texas.

Part 1 - Taxonomy of Dewberries, Blackberries, and Brambles in Texas (Rubus spp)
Part 2 - Key to Rubus spp of Texas (Dewberries, blackberries, and brambles)



In Part 2 I presented a guide to Quick ID the three most common Rubus species in Texas. This post takes species identification to the next level. It is an extract and comparison of the detailed characteristics of each species from the Flora of North America website. There is much value in looking closer at the leaflet shape and size, for example, in helping to determine species for observations that are inconclusive from the Quick ID guide. The botany terminology is heavy, so if you have a dictionary handy you will want to get it.
 R. trivialis R. pensilvanicus R. flagellaris
HABIT Shrubs to 3(–7) dm, moderately to densely armed Shrubs 10–30 dm, armed Shrubs to 3 dm, armed
STEMS biennial biennial biennial
initially low-arching, then falling and creeping (or climbing higher through other vegetation) erect to arching usually creeping, sometimes low-arching and then creeping , flowering branches usually erect
glabrous or moderately hairy glabrous or sparsely to densely hairy glabrous or densely hairy
sparsely to densely short- to long-stipitate-glandular eglandular or sparsely to moderately, rarely densely, sessile- to short-stipitate-glandular eglandular or sparsely sessile- to short-stipitate-glandular
not pruinose not pruinose not pruinose
PRICKLES moderate to dense prickles sparse to dense prickles sparse to dense
recurved erect or slightly retrorse hooked
sometimes distally slender, 1–4 mm, broad-based stout, 4–10 mm, broad-based sometimes distally slender, 1–4 mm, broad-based
BRISTLES absent or sparse to dense absent
erect to retrorse
red to purple, rarely green
slender, weak
gland-tipped
LEAVES persistent or semipersistent deciduous deciduous, some sometimes semipersistent
ternate to palmately compound palmately compound ternate or palmately compound
lustrous not lustrous not lustrous
Stipules stipules filiform, linear, or lanceolate; 2–12(–15) mm filiform to narrowly lanceolate;  (3–)5–15(–20) mm stipules filiform or linear to lanceolate, 3–20 mm
Leaflets leaflets 3–5 leaflets (3–)5(–7) leaflets 3–5
Terminal shape terminal narrowly elliptic or ovate to obovate terminal ovate to lanceolate terminal ovate or elliptic to suborbiculate
Size 5–15 × 3–13 cm 3–11 × 2–7.5 cm
Base base rounded to cuneate base rounded to shallowly cordate base broadly cuneate or rounded to shallowly cordate
Lobes unlobed unlobed usually unlobed, rarely shallowly lobed
Margins margins moderately to coarsely serrate to doubly serrate margins finely to coarsely singly or doubly serrate margins moderately to coarsely serrate to doubly serrate or serrate-dentate
Apex apex acute to acuminate apex acuminate to long-attenuate apex acute or acuminate to short-attenuate
Abaxial surface abaxial surfaces with hooked prickles on midvein abaxial surfaces green, usually with retrorse prickles on midvein abaxial surfaces with prickles on midvein or unarmed
glabrous or sparsely to moderately hairy moderately hairy sparsely to moderately hairy
eglandular or sparsely short-stipitate-glandular along central vein eglandular or sparsely to moderately sessile- to short-stipitate-glandular along veins eglandular or sessile- or short-stipitate-glandular along largest veins.
INFLORESCENCES terminal, on short shoots usually appearing axillary terminal, on short shoots usually appearing axillary terminal, on short shoots usually appearing axillary
1(–3)-flowered (2–)5–12(–16)-flowered 1–3(–8)-flowered
cymiform, racemiform, or thyrsiform racemiform
Flowering Jan–Jun Flowering May–Jul Flowering Mar–Jun
PEDICELS prickles and, often, bristles moderate to dense, recurved unarmed or prickles sparse, erect unarmed or prickles sparse to moderate, retrorse to hooked
moderately to densely hairy glabrous or sparsely to densely hairy moderately to densely hairy
sparsely to moderately sessile- to short-stipitate-glandular eglandular or sparsely to moderately sessile- to short-stipitate-glandular usually sparsely to densely sessile- or short-stipitate-glandular, rarely eglandular
FLOWERS bisexual bisexual bisexual
petals white to pink petals white petals white
elliptic to obovate, 10–16(–25) mm usually obovate to elliptic, rarely suborbiculate, 8–40 mm elliptic, obovate, or oblanceolate, 8–20 mm
filaments filiform filaments filiform filaments filiform
ovaries glabrous ovaries glabrous ovaries glabrous
FRUITS black black black, sometimes dark red
globose to ovoid, 1–1.5(–2) cm globose to cylindric, 1–2 cm globose to cylindric, 1–2 cm
drupelets 10–50 drupelets 10–100 drupelets 10–40
strongly coherent, separating with torus attached strongly coherent, separating with torus attached strongly coherent, separating with torus attached
Rubus trivialis is distinguished from other species of Rubus by its frequently glandular-bristly and generally creeping stems, abundant recurved prickles, and typically persistent or semipersistent, lustrous primocane leaves with relatively narrow leaflets. Although emerging primocanes typically reach to 30 cm above the ground, vigorous plants can have new primocanes standing erect to 70 cm that later fall to the ground or onto adjacent vegetation as they continue to enlarge.

Rubus flagellaris is extremely polymorphic, ranging from plants with low-arching (and later creeping) stems and relatively few prickles to low, creeping plants with abundant prickles. Individual plants in some years will produce abundant, arching, poorly armed stems, and in others creeping, well-armed stems. Prickle shape also varies in these plants both within a year and among different years. Local variants seem to readily intergrade with other variants.

Apparent consistent features of Rubus flagellaris are terete primocanes to 7 mm diam. near the base and presence of rigid, hooked primocane prickles to 4 mm. Primocanes that tip-root and are low and long-running are nearly consistent features of R. flagellaris. Flower number per inflorescence throughout most of the geographic range of R. flagellaris is one to three or, rarely, five.

Posted on February 01, 2020 11:18 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 7 comments

January 31, 2020

Key to Rubus spp of Texas (Dewberries, blackberries, and brambles)


Thank you for your interest in brambles and referencing this journal post. Due to the growing effort to further complicate Rubus by adding hundreds of complex species to the iNat database instead of taking the condensed species route like Flora of North America, I have ended my participation in ID'ing Rubus observations. The 3 posts I made will remain online for anyone that cares to reference them.




This post is Part 2 of my series on Rubus species in Texas.

Part 1 - Taxonomy of Dewberries, Blackberries, and Brambles in Texas (Rubus spp)
Part 3 - Rubus spp (of Texas) comparison of features



In June, 2019 I tackled the Taxonomy of Dewberries, Blackberries, and Brambles in Texas (Rubus spp) in a journal post. If you are questioning why there are only 6 valid species of Rubus in Texas, you'll want to head there first. If you are looking for a quick way to figure out which species is which, you can start here.


Two things to keep in mind before we start...
1) Approximately 90% of all Rubus species in Texas are Rubus trivialis. All of the others combined make up the remaining 10%.
2) Common names lead people to pick the wrong ID on iNaturalist, and MANY of the existing observations are identified (and agreed upon) incorrectly because of it. Those darn common names!

This post looks at the three most common species in Texas: R. trivialis, R. pensilvanicus, and R. flagellaris.

For a quick species level ID, you need to photograph or note at least the following:
Habit - Low growing/creeping/trailing vs upright over 3 feet
Stems - With or without bristles
Leaflets - # of leaflets and luster (shiny/not shiny)

For a higher confidence species ID, or to key out your observation at Flora of North America you will also need the following:
Leaflets - Shape of the terminal leaflet, underside of leaflets showing the midveins and surfaces, and pedicels (leaflet stems)
Stipules - (Small leaflike appendages typically in pairs at the base of the leaf stalk.) Shape of the stipules
Flowers - Number of flowers per stem, color of petals


The next thing you will want to be aware of is the difference between bristles and prickles.
Bristles - stiff hairs
Prickles - sharp outgrowth from the stem, similar to a thorn


If your stem has both, it is automatically R. trivialis.



Rubus trivialis ("Southern Dewberry")

QUICK ID:


Low growing, under 1 foot high

Stems with prickles and bristles
3 or 5 shiny leaflets, somewhat narrow

"Rubus trivialis is distinguished from other species of Rubus by its frequently glandular-bristly and generally creeping stems, abundant recurved prickles, and typically persistent or semipersistent, lustrous primocane leaves with relatively narrow leaflets."

HABIT: Trailing, or erect but low growing; under 1 foot high
STEMS: Armed with prickles and bristles, glabrous (no fine hairs)
PRICKLES: broad-based, recurved (curved backward)
BRISTLES: glandular tipped, absent to sparse to dense
LEAVES: 3-5 leaflets, relatively narrow and lustrous (shiny) on top
FRUIT/FLOWERS: 1-flowered (sometimes up to 3), petals white to pink. (In MY experience, this species fruits first in the season and has larger fruit, but I haven't verified that.)

The full description of R. trivialis can be found at Flora of North America.



Rubus pensilvanicus ("Pennsylvania Blackberry")

QUICK ID:

Grows upright 3-9 feet Stems with only prickles
5 rounded leaflets

HABIT: Grows upright 3-9 feet
STEMS: Armed with prickles, glabrous or sparsely to densely hairy
PRICKLES: Erect (straight out) or retrorse (pointing backward/down the stem)
BRISTLES: Absent
LEAVES: 5 rounded leaflets, but can be anywhere from 3-7 leaflets, not lustrous (shiny) on top
FRUIT/FLOWERS: 5-12 flowered


Rubus flagellaris ("Common Dewberry")

QUICK ID:

Low growing, under 1 foot high Stems with only prickles
3-5 rounded leaflets, not shiny

HABIT: Creeping, or low-arching and then creeping; under 1 foot high
STEMS: Armed with prickles, glabrous (without hairs) or densely hairy
PRICKLES: broad-based, hooked, sparse to dense
BRISTLES: Absent
LEAVES: 3-5 leaflets, not lustrous (shiny) on top, terminal leaflet is usually on a short pedicel (leaflet stem) and lateral leaflets are sessile (without a stem) but this can also be seen in R. trivialis.
FRUIT/FLOWERS: 1–3 flowered, petals white
*Note - R. flagellaris can be extremely polymorphic (variable characters)





CONDENSED FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA KEY TO (TEXAS) RUBUS SPECIES

Added 3/28/2020

I've found the need to refer back to the FNA key a few times, so I'm including the key with only relevant couplets here. You can see the full N. America Rubus key here.


1




+
Growing up to 1 foot tall (rarely to 2 feet in R. trivialis, but then falling); stems usually creeping, sometimes erect but low growing, or higher only when using other vegetation for support

Growing over 1 foot tall; stems erect or arching
2




3
2



+
Stems: bristles absent; leaves deciduous, some occasionally semipersistent, not lustrous; inflorescences 1–3(–8)-flowered; petals white.

Stems: bristles absent or gland-tipped, red to purple, rarely green, slender; leaves persistent or semipersistent, lustrous; inflorescences 1(–3)-flowered; petals white to pink.
R. flagellaris



R. trivialis
3


+
Leaflet abaxial surfaces usually closely, densely white-hairy or gray-hairy

Leaflet abaxial surfaces usually glabrous or sparsely to densely hairy or puberulent, (not white-hairy or gray-hairy)
4


R. pensylvanicus
4


+
Inflorescences thyrsiform, elongate, (projected well beyond subtending leaves), 10–60(–100)-flowered.

Inflorescences cymiform to thyrsiform, compact, (not projected well beyond subtending leaves), 3–15(–25)-flowered.
R. bifrons


R. pascuus
Posted on January 31, 2020 09:23 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 28 comments

Recurved, Retrorse, Reflexed/Refracted

I got out my terminology book (finally) which has images of all three terms. If I get time to find better images, or scan the book images which are good, I'll update them. At least this way I can find them again!


Recurved - curved backward like a bow.
Ex: The petals of this Lilium sp




Retrorse - directed or downward or backward
Ex: The hairs on the stem of this grass




Reflexed or Refracted - Bent backward or downward
Ex: The petals of this flower

Posted on January 31, 2020 12:23 AM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 3 comments | Leave a comment

December 14, 2019

Texas Woolly Oak Galls

In an effort to simplify the identification of woolly looking oak galls in Texas, I pulled this info from BugGuide. It's just a first draft, so comments and suggestions are very welcome!

Charley Eiseman advises that galls on Texas oaks are largely understudied. The data for the Texas observations on BugGuide is VERY limited. Keep in mind there are probably several/many unidentified species, too.

If you are interested in helping to document galls (any, not just woolly ones) for identification, I recommend the following:

  • Photograph the whole leaf, top and bottom.
  • Photograph the gall up close.
  • If possible, break open the gall and photograph what is inside.
  • Perhaps most importantly, note the host plant.

Galls are frequently specific to a genus (oaks, elms, hackberries, etc) and to where they occur on the plant (upper-/lowerside of leaf, leaf midrib, petiole, stem, etc.) They also may or may not have features that affect the opposite side of the leaf which can help in identification.


Gall-forming Insect Hosts Gall type Gall description Sources
Andricus pattoni
WHITE OAKS
Post Oak (stellata)
White Shin Oak (breviloba)
Sand Post Oak (margarettae)
Leaf midrib, underside Begins to develop in August. Galls similar to Andricus quercusflocci (which is not a TX species.) "Woolly, dirty white, of 2-10 seed-like bodies attached by one end on midrib on upper or lower side, in fall."

Unconfirmed in TX
BugGuide
BG See also
Andricus quercuslanigera
"Wool-bearing Gall Wasp"
LIVE OAKS
Southern Live Oak (virginiana)
[Texas Live Oak (fusiformis)]
Leaf midrib, underside "Hemispherical or irregular tufts 1/2 inch long of rather long, whitish or reddish wool covering, 2 to 6 irregular brown, seed-like kernels on under side of midrib, diameter 1/12 inch, on live oak, summer."
BugGuide
Callirhytis furva
"Furry Oak Leaf Gall Wasp"
RED OAKS Leaf, upperside "Probably on all the red oaks"
"Small cluster of globular galls, 3-4 mm, each covered with short, straight brown hairs, upper side, fall"
"Galls drop from leaves in October; adults emerge in the second or third spring in late March."

Unconfirmed in TX
BugGuide
Callirhytis lanata
"Woolly Oak Gall"
RED OAKS Leaf, underside "Forms woolly, detachable galls on leaves of various species in the red oak group. The galls drop in October and adults may emerge in the second, third, or fourth spring." BugGuide
Callirhytis quercusoperator
"Woolly Catkin Gall Wasp"
RED OAKS Flower "Oval masses 2 to 3 inches in diameter, hairs greenish white or rose tinted, sometimes deep red, there may be 150 or more cells each less than 1/10 of an inch in diameter." BugGuide
Callirhytis seminator
"Wool Sower Gall Wasp"
WHITE OAKS
Post Oak (stellata)
Stem
"Spring; White with pink spots, detachable stem gall. Many celled. Around 20mm in diameter." BugGuide
Neuroterus quercusverrucarum
"Oak Flake Gall Wasp"
WHITE OAKS
Bur Oak (macrocarpa)
Chinkapin (muehlenbergii)
Post Oak (stellata)
Leaf, underside "Causes fuzzy, white to brown galls, about 2.5 mm across, on the undersides of leaves of oaks in the white oak group. Adults emerge from galls in April."
Typically many scattered on one leaf.
BugGuide

Images linked from BugGuide. All rights retained by individual photographers listed on the linked pages.

Posted on December 14, 2019 05:02 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 8 comments | Leave a comment

October 01, 2019

Another successful BioBlitz! Thank you to everyone that came!

Thank you to everyone that came to participate in our 2nd Overton Ridge Park BioBlitz! We had around 40 folks come out! I see the observations starting to roll in and I'm thrilled with what we observed!

Posted on October 01, 2019 10:20 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 1 comment | Leave a comment

August 10, 2019

Hymetta spp (Erythroneurini) Leafhoppers

I've been curious about some Hymetta spp leafhoppers and decided to dig into the species key since BugGuide doesn't have anything specifically listed. They do reference the Dmitriev 3I Interactive Keys and Taxonomic Databases, but I was able to find a paper with more details. (Cited at the bottom of this post.) To simplify things, I just pulled out what I thought was important info.

To summarize, the key to species is strictly limited to genitalia characters. Wing patterns are so similar between the species, that it sometimes comes down to the density of red spots, as in H. balteata and H. anthisma.

Genus Hymetta
(Extract of physical description)
Dorsum yellow or white, with reddish or brown color pattern; vertex, pronotum, and mesonotum pale, apex of scutellum black; forewing with characteristic numerous irregular red or brownish dots, with or without brown crossband; without dark spot at costal margin; apical cell II without distal spot; inner apical cell without brown spot.

H. kansasensis: Length 3.2–3.5 mm. Coloration as described for genus. Distribution: Central and southeastern USA. (Not showing TX)
H. balteata: Length 3.1–3.4 mm. Coloration variable, either as described for genus or paler overall. Distribution: Central and eastern USA (Incl TX)
H. anthisma: Length 3.3–3.6 mm. Coloration typical for genus, wings usually densely covered with red dots. Distribution: Central and eastern USA. (Incl TX)
H. trifasciata: Length 3–3.4 mm. Coloration as described for genus. Distribution: Central and eastern USA. (Incl TX)
H. arizoniana: Length 3.3–3.7 mm. Coloration typical for genus. Distribution: Arizona.

Source:
Review of the New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) I. Genera Erythroneura, Erasmoneura, Rossmoneura, and Hymetta
Dmitriev, Dmitry A.; Dietrich, Christopher H.
2007
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/26473/Bulletin38%282%29.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

I also reviewed Fairbairn 1928 which lists physical characters in the species key, but I assume to revision found them to be unreliable.
Fairbairn, Vera M. "The Genus Hymetta (Homoptera, Cicadellidae)." Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 1, no. 4 (1928): 84-92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25081244.

Posted on August 10, 2019 03:31 AM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 1 observation | 0 comments | Leave a comment

July 27, 2019

Save the date - Kimberlie's 2nd Annual Birthday BioBlitz!!

I've had several questions lately about whether I'm going to make my Birthday BioBlitz an annual event. Well, heck YEAH!

More info will follow as it gets closer, but it will be similar to last year's event. (Daylight bioblitz followed by mothing at the same location, Overton Ridge Park in Keller. Open to anyone and everyone.)

So, in the meantime, mark your calendars as BUSY for Saturday, September 28th from 5-10pm(-ish).

Here's what we saw last year: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/overton-ridge-park-bioblitz-fall-2018

@aesbiologist @amzapp @annikaml @beckymn @betsymarsh @bob777 @brentano @briangooding @cameralenswrangler @catenatus @cdroz105 @cgritz @cindylcobb5 @connlindajo @daniel112 @elizrose @galactic_bug_man @gcwarbler @itmndeborah @justjenny @k8thegr8 @kalamurphyking @katelyn3 @lovebirder @lulubelle @mchlfx @mikef451 @mokennon @nanofishology @naturemom @oddfitz @pfau_tarleton @postoak @rehb @robin_g @sambiology @sonnia @squaylei2000 @suz @tadamcochran @taosit @tfandre @walkingstick2 @wildcarrot

Posted on July 27, 2019 06:38 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 25 comments | Leave a comment

July 06, 2019

Patriotic Odonates

I had some time to explore today, the day after July 4th. Apparently the dragonflies were celebrating yesterday, too!


Libellula croceipennis, Neon Skimmer


Plathemis lydia, Common Whitetail


Libellula incesta, Slaty Skimmer

Posted on July 06, 2019 05:25 AM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 3 observations | 2 comments | Leave a comment

June 17, 2019

Dragonfly jackpot!

I spent the day with @brentano at a couple of places I had never been to before. Of course he is always looking for Odes, but I usually have my eyes toward tiny creatures. The day/location/guide did not disappoint! I saw 4 lifer dragonflies (Russet-tipped Clubtail, Swift River Cruiser, Cobra Clubtail, and Prince Basketail) and more Widow Skimmers than you could possibly count.

We saw other stuff, too, but I haven't finished editing those photos. I just had to get the dragonflies up!

Edited 6/18: Oops! I forgot to include the Calico Pennant!

Posted on June 17, 2019 08:56 PM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 5 observations | 5 comments | Leave a comment

June 15, 2019

Taxonomy of Dewberries, Blackberries, and Brambles in Texas (Rubus spp)


Thank you for your interest in brambles and referencing this journal post. Due to the growing effort to further complicate Rubus by adding hundreds of complex species to the iNat database instead of taking the condensed species route like Flora of North America, I have ended my participation in ID'ing Rubus observations. The 3 posts I made will remain online for anyone that cares to reference them.




This post is Part 1 of my series on Rubus species in Texas.
Part 2 - Key to Rubus spp of Texas (Dewberries, blackberries, and brambles)
Part 3 - Rubus spp (of Texas) comparison of features

I have basically identified my Rubus observations as R. trivialis or R. oklahomus, but I was aware there were other possibilities that I should look into. I've been looking closer at Rubus species in Texas this past 2 weeks. This journal post will walk through the musical score that is Rubus taxonomy yesterday, today, and tomorrow in Texas.

YESTERDAY
The Flora of North Central Texas, aka FNCT, (the primary flora key for DFW) listed 6 possible species in DFW: aborignium, apogaeus, bifrons, oklahomus, trivialis, and riograndis. iNat observations were in 14 species, so I knew we had some errors. I looked at all 14 species on BONAP to see which of those 14 were not documented in Texas at all. I manually added genus level IDs and comments to those (DFW) observations with the link to the map. Afterward, I went back and reviewed all of Texas observations and did the same for those.

I'll note here that if you upload an observation of a Rubus species, the ID suggestions frequently come up with species not in Texas as a first choice. (Ex. R. armeniacus.) Typically only 1 of the top 5 species recommendations is in Texas. It may even say "Seen nearby" since so many were mis-ID'ed.

If you browse the species maps for Rubus on BONAP you will count 227 species in North America. I kid you not. Or maybe it was 229. Or 224. I lost count. Fortunately, not all of those are in Texas, though. (USDA Plants Database is in line with BONAP.)

So I wandered over to Flora of North America, aka FNA, to see what they had to say about it. I'll give you the short version here: "Rubus, especially the blackberries, presents some of the most difficult species-level problems, because of polyploidy, apomixis, and hybridization. As a result, differences of opinion on the number of species to be recognized from a given region can vary tremendously... R. K. Godfrey (1988) wrote, 'oversimplification appears to be the only way to achieve a practicable solution to the dilemma.'" (I'll agree with that!)

The FNA key lists about 25 species for all of North America. I looked at every single one and the distribution ranges to find all of the species in Texas. They only list FIVE: bifrons, flagellaris, pascuus, pensilvanicus, and trivialis.

Another hop over to Plants of the World Online, aka POWO, (which iNat uses to determine synonyms and currently accepted names) was aligned with FNA. (R. riograndis is treated as R. trivialis in FNA, but not in POWO, so that will be our 6th.)
Which brings me to...

TODAY
Here are a list of the synonyms and their currently accepted names for just the DFW species listed in FNCT:
R. aboriginum --> R. flagellaris
R. apogaeus --> R. flagellaris
R. bifrons --> No change
R. oklahomus --> R. pensilvanicus
R. trivialis --> No change
R. riograndis --> No change

These changes will bring iNat taxa in line with FNA and POWO and their state range maps, but it will require you to know the previous name to look at county maps on BONAP (which was last updated online in 2013/14.)

TOMORROW
You will begin to see some curation changes on iNat affecting Texas Rubus species, to bring us into agreement with FNA and POWO, as listed above.

To summarize, all of TEXAS only has 6 possible Rubus species:
bifrons,
flagellaris,
pascuus,
pensilvanicus,
trivialis, and
riograndis.

This means R. allegheniensis and R. fruticosis are not valid TX species under any source.

Any observations ID'ed otherwise would be 1) a species not in Texas according to the simplified species list of FNA and PONO, 2) a cultivar, or 3) an old synonym that needs to be curated to the simplified list.

As a next step, I hope to put together a VERY simplified illustrated guide to the 3 most common Texas species: R. trivialis, R. flagellaris, and R. pensilvanicus. The purpose will be to give a quick and dirty way to differentiate those, as well as suggestions on what photos would help for a species-level ID.

The quick key journal post is now published here:
https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/kimberlietx/30266-key-to-rubus-spp-of-texas-dewberries-blackberries-and-brambles

Posted on June 15, 2019 03:57 AM by kimberlietx kimberlietx | 14 comments