City Nature Challenge 2018: Los Angeles's Journal

Journal archives for May 2018

May 2, 2018

Let's Keep the Energy Going!

As you know, the observation period ended at midnight last night. Since then, many of you have worked tirelessly to help identify observations. Thank you!!!

Our numbers have been rising, but they are still below last year's. However, the contest is not over yet. Any picture taken during April 27-30 can still be entered into iNaturalist up until May 4 at 9:00 a.m. That's another 36 hours to enter your observations and to add IDs.

Why should you help identify observations?

1) It makes people feel good. Imagine if no one looked at your submissions and you never found out what what that weird looking bug was? Would you want to keep participating? Would you learn anything new?

2) In order for an observation to become "research grade" it needs to have three things: a photo or sound recording, a geographic location, and a community ID (meaning that at least one other person agrees that it is a red-tailed hawk, striped skunk, or asian ladybeetle, etc.) Research grade observations are important because they are the most useful for scientists AND they are automatically fed into the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. How cool is that -- a whole world of researchers using your data!

3) It raises both our count for species identifiers. Let's face it, we're probably not going to beat San Francisco in number of observations, but what about species? The difference is a lot closer in that category.

4) You might have fun! Have you heard about the ID Party we're hosting tomorrow night at Angel City Brewery? It's going to be a blast. Come, hang out with us, help with observations, and maybe drink some beer. It's May 2 from 4:00 - 9:00 p.m. See the link for more information. Reservations have officially closed, but feel free to come anyway.

How can I help if I'm not an expert?

1) If you're a beginner -- there are always many observations that simply list "bird" or "plant" and many more that don't have any sort of label. If you can make,at least one general suggestion, you're helping to narrow it down. We do have experts looking, but they can't find that rare lizard if no one has even added the label, "lizard" to the observation.

2) If you're intermediate -- pick one category and dive deep. Narrow your search results to that one category and either confirm someone's guess or suggest something different. My husband decided that he was going to look at brown widow spiders. After years of nighttime spider hunts, he knows them really well.

3) You might learn something new. Poking around in iNaturalist invariably leads me to learn something new and at tomorrow night's ID Party, we're going to have scientists from the museum share tips for identification. So come to hang out with us, help with observations, boost our numbers, drink some beer and learn something new!

We're almost in the final stretch. Whether you make your identifications from the comfort of your own home, while riding the train to work, or at tomorrow's party, we hope that you'll join in the ID phase of the City Nature Challenge.

Posted on May 2, 2018 04:40 AM by amyjaecker-jones amyjaecker-jones | 1 comment | Leave a comment

Our Numbers are Climbing!

We have just passed last year's numbers for observations and species. We are currently at 18, 274 observations and 2,296 species. Thank you everyone for your help with observations and IDs. Keep up the good work!

Posted on May 2, 2018 09:49 PM by amyjaecker-jones amyjaecker-jones | 0 comments | Leave a comment

May 4, 2018

City Nature Challenge 2018 Results!!

This year's City Nature Challenge was AMAZING! Almost 70 cities around the world, all mobilizing their residents and visitors to go out and find and document their local nature. The energy and enthusiasm for the City Nature Challenge was once again amazing- watching hundreds of thousands of observations flow in from around the world was truly inspiring. Our collective impact was obvious and incredible - we also gave iNaturalist its biggest 4 days in a row EVER!

Here are the results of the City Nature Challenge (as of 9:00 a.m., May 4 in each city’s time zone):
All 68 cities together:
Observations: 441,888
People: 17,329

All 63 cities using iNaturalist:
Observations: 423,845
Species: 18,116
People: 16,544

We also made 4,075 Research Grade observations of 599 rare, endangered, and threatened species globally, and added over 100 new species that had not previously been recorded on iNaturalist EVER!

Congratulations to our top five observers, species-finders, and identifiers across ALL the City Nature Challenge cities:
Observers: @krentan, @thary, @danielatha, @affan1990, @ecologist
Species-finders: @anewman, @rcurtis, @finatic, @nanofishology, @sambiology
Identifiers: @jrebman, @srall, @pihlaviita, @connlindajo, @sambiology
Big shout out to @jrebman for making over 10,000 identification!!

This year it was a sweep, with the San Francisco Bay Area winning in all three categories.
Most observations: 41,737
Most species found: 3,211
Most participants: 1,532

Here's the top five in each category:

Observations
San Francisco Bay Area: 41,737
Dallas/Fort Worth Area: 34,218
San Diego County: 33,448
Klang Valley / Greater Kuala Lumpur: 25,287
Washington- D.C. Metro Area: 22,800

Species
San Francisco Bay Area: 3,211
Houston Area: 3,088
San Diego County: 2,946
Hong Kong SAR: 2,932
Dallas/Fort Worth Area: 2,560

People
San Francisco Bay Area: 1,532
San Diego County: 1,211
Boston: 992
Washington- D.C. Metro Area: 872
Los Angeles County: 855

...and some more results...
City with highest percentage of verifiable (has evidence of the organism and is not marked captive or cultivated) observations: Tulsa, Oklahoma with 98.9%
City with highest percentage of verifiable observations making it to Research Grade: Cádiz, Spain with 70.5%
City that added the most new species to their region on iNaturalist through the City Nature Challenge: Kuala Lumpur (Klang Valley), Malaysia with 1392 new species documented on iNaturalist
City that added the most new iNaturalist participants to their region through the City Nature Challenge: San Diego, California with 733 new observers added during the City Nature Challenge

Thanks again to everyone who participated in the City Nature Challenge this year! And stay tuned for next year, when the City Nature Challenge hopefully makes it to all seven continents--anyone got friends in Africa or Oceania who want to organize in 2019?

Posted on May 4, 2018 07:54 PM by lhiggins lhiggins | 0 comments | Leave a comment

May 8, 2018

Share Your Thoughts on the 2018 City Nature Challenge

Thank you for submitting observations to this year's City Nature Challenge. Worldwide, 17,000 people recorded 441,888 observations over the course of just 4 days. It was the biggest period of iNaturalist use ever! In L.A., we were able to increase our number of observations by 1,271 over last year and the number of species by 339! We also remained in the top 5 for number of people observing (that's out of a field of 68 cities - way to go L.A.!).

You can help us evaluate and improve upon the City Nature Challenge by filling out this short online survey. As with the City Nature Challenge itself, the goal of this survey is to gain the perspective of a global community and will help to evaluate how projects of this type can inform best practices around the world. If you've already completed it, either online or at one of our events, please accept our grateful thanks. If not, please take a few minutes to complete it now.

Link to survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc-hR4_3Xsd7fkC8FSkVzecKlT--GPuOYydmw7E4XnReQh5yA/viewform

Thank you for your support of community science and contributing to the first GLOBAL City Nature Challenge.

Sincerely,

NHMLA Community Science Program

Posted on May 8, 2018 07:17 PM by amyjaecker-jones amyjaecker-jones | 0 comments | Leave a comment

Archives