Actually, on second look, I'm thinking D. parviceps, but I would need to see either below the eye or the hidden surfaces of the thighs to tell for sure.
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
.jpg?1309818609){kind=icon}
Comments & Identifications
This looks like D. brevifrons. Where did you take this, along the road? Did we make a data sheet for this one?
I think this was an incidental, and we didn't make a sheet for it. I was by the pond on the road.
Actually, on second look, I'm thinking D. parviceps, but I would need to see either below the eye or the hidden surfaces of the thighs to tell for sure.
Add a comment
Add an identification