This observation lies outside the range iNat has for this species. This could mean iNat's range is wrong, the ID is wrong, a vagrant occurrence, or a range expansion!
View the range
It's possible someone put it there, although I doubt it. Most of the people going to Snake Road aren't folks who would do such a thing. My guess would be that it fell from the bluff and just caught the branch on the way down.
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
Comments & Identifications
Wow, in a tree? Did someone put it there?
It's possible someone put it there, although I doubt it. Most of the people going to Snake Road aren't folks who would do such a thing. My guess would be that it fell from the bluff and just caught the branch on the way down.
Add a comment
Add an identification