First one is Darevskia dahli. I don't know for sure about the lizard from the second photo.
In this areas where more than 1-2 species lieve together, It is tough to identify juveniles, as well as some morphs and interbreeds by color and pattern only. Sometimes, carefull considerstion of scalation is necessary.
The data quality assessment is a summary of an observation's accuracy. All
observations start as "casual" grade, and achieve
"research" grade when
the iNat community agrees with the observer's ID, where an "agreeing"
identification is one that matches exactly or is of a child taxon of the
observer's ID. For example, if Scott says it's a mammal and Ken-ichi
says it's Homo sapiens, then Ken-ichi agrees with Scott.
the observation has a date
the observation is georeferenced (i.e. has lat/lon coordinates)
the observation has a photo
Observations will revert to "casual" grade if the above conditions aren't met or
the community agrees the location doesn't looks accurate (e.g. monkeys in the middle of the ocean, hippos in office buildings, etc.)
the community agrees the organism isn't wild/naturalized (e.g. captive or cultivated by humans or intelligent space aliens)
Comments & Identifications
Zack, was the lizard from the second photo smaller than the first one?
ohhh hard to remember it was 2 year ago , they were quite the same I guess, something around 11-12 cm, what you think! they are other species?
tail included
First one is Darevskia dahli. I don't know for sure about the lizard from the second photo.
In this areas where more than 1-2 species lieve together, It is tough to identify juveniles, as well as some morphs and interbreeds by color and pattern only. Sometimes, carefull considerstion of scalation is necessary.
Add a comment
Add an identification