Pessoa-Silva M, Hara MR, Pinto-da-Rocha R (2021) Revision of the southern Andean genus Sadocus Sørensen, 1886 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae, Pachylinae). ZooKeys 1025: 91-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1025.57806 (Link)
Please follow the authorities we list in the Curator's Guide. EOL is not one of them, and it's hard to consider them an authority at all since they support multiple taxonomies and generally don't have opinions on what's current or not. GoBotany / Flora Nova Angliae consider B. dissectum to be current (https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org/species/botrychium/dissectum/), as does The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-26602173), so I would revert this change... which is something I need to do, I think, if we want to do it cleanly. Anyway, please don't commit any more taxon changes using authorities we haven't listed. If you want to add more authorities, let's talk about it in the Google Group.
Oops, I missed you saying that you needed to do it. Sorry if I screwed it up (again). Good grief. I'm going to stop messing with taxonomy, unless it's VERY clear that something is wrong (e.g., all those palms that were in a fish genus).
Actually I think what you did is just fine. It just creates a circular loop of swaps, which might actually be better than what I was going to do, since it preserves the history.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Please follow the authorities we list in the Curator's Guide. EOL is not one of them, and it's hard to consider them an authority at all since they support multiple taxonomies and generally don't have opinions on what's current or not. GoBotany / Flora Nova Angliae consider B. dissectum to be current (https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org/species/botrychium/dissectum/), as does The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-26602173), so I would revert this change... which is something I need to do, I think, if we want to do it cleanly. Anyway, please don't commit any more taxon changes using authorities we haven't listed. If you want to add more authorities, let's talk about it in the Google Group.