sensu lato range for sensu stricto taxon
range updated
I'm not sure what went on here, but it looks like Burhinus oedicnemus 4923 is sensu lato when it should be sensu stricto with Burhinus indicus 144482 split off I recommend changing the range associated with Burhinus oedicnemus 4923 see https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_swaps/4053#activity_comment_3236178 & https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/2248
About
Help
Forum
Press
Jobs
Our Blog
Community Guidelines
Terms of Use
Privacy
I'm not sure what went on here, but it looks like
Burhinus oedicnemus 4923 is sensu lato when it should be sensu stricto with Burhinus indicus 144482 split off
I recommend changing the range associated with Burhinus oedicnemus 4923
see https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_swaps/4053#activity_comment_3236178 &
https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/2248