Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
luiscarlosrodrguezmndez Cyanopepla orbona

should be merged with C. similis since C. orbona is a junior synonym://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid01brit/page/274/mode/1up?view=theater

Nov. 15, 2021 01:32:22 +0000 borisb

Comments

https://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/cyanopepla/

Note we have observations outside the range given there. Different one?

Posted by borisb 6 months ago

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/133721
observations Mexico - Ecuador, and one in more northern Brazil commented.

Posted by borisb 6 months ago

Same author transferred the same species to Callopepla some years before: https://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid01brituoft/page/438/mode/1up?view=theater. They are synonyms, even funet.fi don't realized of that: https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/callopepla/ ; https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/cyanopepla/

Hard to say what is valid, the first or later on? Looks like Hampson just forgot that genus change.

Posted by regisrafael 6 months ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments