Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
luiscarlosrodrguezmndez | Cyanopepla orbona |
should be merged with C. similis since C. orbona is a junior synonym://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid01brit/page/274/mode/1up?view=theater |
Nov. 15, 2021 01:32:22 +0000 | borisb |
Note we have observations outside the range given there. Different one?
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/133721
observations Mexico - Ecuador, and one in more northern Brazil commented.
Same author transferred the same species to Callopepla some years before: https://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid01brituoft/page/438/mode/1up?view=theater. They are synonyms, even funet.fi don't realized of that: https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/callopepla/ ; https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/cyanopepla/
Hard to say what is valid, the first or later on? Looks like Hampson just forgot that genus change.
https://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid01brit/page/274/mode/1up?view=theater