| Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| martinwettges | htsvoboda | Passiflora 'Lady Margaret' (Hybrid Passiflora coccinea × incarnata) |
the indicated parentage is wrong. |
Dec. 10, 2021 22:13:50 +0000 | martinwettges |
taxon change commited |
Comments
It should probably never have been added at all, since it looks like a cultivar. And your link is broken @martinwettges
@kitty12 this hybrid, originally an ornamental, has become a dangerous invasive in both southern US and eastern Asia, and I think it is an important chore for iN to document its spreading and to name it correctly. Sorry about the broken link, another try: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8748.2006.00533.x
When Skimina created the hybrid all alleged P. coccinea in cultivation were indeed P. miniata.
I'll have to let someone who has access to the Wiley library evaluate the article, I'm afraid.
@carrieseltzer could you help here? I can send you a PDF of the publication. Still wrong parentage.
See: John Vanderplank: Passiflora miniata, Curtis Botanical Magazine, Volume 23, Issue 3
"Successful hybridisation [of P. miniata] with P. incarnata L. as the fruit parent produced the cultivars P. ‘Lady Margaret’ (Tim Skimina) and, with P. incarnata var. alba, P. ‘Sjana’ (Henk Wouters)."
Female parent is P. miniata, not P. coccinea. See John Vanderplank: Passiflora miniata, Curtis Botanical Magazine, Volume23, Issue3
August 2006, p. 223-230 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8748.2006.00533
"Successful hybridisation [of P. miniata] with P. in- carnata L. as the fruit parent produced the cultivars P. ‘Lady Margaret’ (Tim Skimina) and, with P. incarnata var. alba, P. ‘Sjana’ (Henk Wouters)."