Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bernardofrz | lrubio7 | Genus Metaphotina |
o gênero ainda é valido |
May. 11, 2022 05:59:24 +0000 | borisb |
Here is the link to the publication where the genus has been revalidated 3 years ago. Mantodea SpeciesFile is far from updated for many Neotropical taxa.
situation with us is as follows:
Metaphotina inactivated by swap [2022] into Acontista;
a single taxon in species rank, and its observations affected:
brevipennis Saussure, 1872.
[taxa/1238495 / 1352611; inactive]
[taxa/748773-Acontista-brevipennis; inactive, too!]
Ahh:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/104118
(not yet committed, lacks active parent taxon).
. . . go to Metaphotina, in addition to brevipennis:
piracicabensis Toledo Piza, 1967 [genotype]
austri Ferraz et. al., 2023;
That is not yet all, I suppose?
@bernardofrz for completion
Sugeriram sinonimizar o gênero Metaphotina novamente com Acontista sendo que o gênero é válido