Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
bernardofrz lrubio7 Genus Metaphotina

o gênero ainda é valido

May. 11, 2022 05:59:24 +0000 borisb

Comments

Sugeriram sinonimizar o gênero Metaphotina novamente com Acontista sendo que o gênero é válido

Posted by bernardofrz almost 2 years ago

Here is the link to the publication where the genus has been revalidated 3 years ago. Mantodea SpeciesFile is far from updated for many Neotropical taxa.

https://bioone.org/ebooks/thomas-say-monographs/the-neotropical-polymorphic-earless-praying-mantises-part-ii-taxonomic-review-of-the-genera-and-checklist-of-species-insecta-mantodea-acanthopoidea/eISBN-9781960154347/10.4182/QQHU9127

Posted by bernardofrz 6 months ago

situation with us is as follows:
Metaphotina inactivated by swap [2022] into Acontista;
a single taxon in species rank, and its observations affected:
brevipennis Saussure, 1872.
[taxa/1238495 / 1352611; inactive]
[taxa/748773-Acontista-brevipennis; inactive, too!]

Ahh:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/104118
(not yet committed, lacks active parent taxon).

Posted by borisb 6 months ago

. . . go to Metaphotina, in addition to brevipennis:
piracicabensis Toledo Piza, 1967 [genotype]
austri Ferraz et. al., 2023;
That is not yet all, I suppose?
@bernardofrz for completion

Posted by borisb 6 months ago

Yes, "Ferraz" it's me! At the moment the genus Metaphotina has five species attributed to it:

Metaphotina piracicabensis Piza, 1964 [genotype]
Metaphotina bimaculata Saussure, 1870
Metaphotina brevipennis Saussure, 1872
Metaphotina rehni Giglio-Tos, 1927
Metaphotina austri Ferraz et al. 2023

Posted by bernardofrz 6 months ago

All fixed :-)

Posted by borisb 6 months ago

Thank you !!

Posted by bernardofrz 5 months ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments