Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
beetledude Genus Conoderus

Conoderus is junior synonym of Monocrepidius

May. 14, 2022 21:51:57 +0000 borisb

Comments

 
Conoderus Eschscholtz, 1829: 31 JUNIOR

= Monocrepidius Eschscholtz, 1829: 31 VALID

 
Kundrata R, Kubaczkova M, Prosvirov AS, Douglas HB, Fojtikova A, Costa C, Bousquet Y, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Bouchard P (2019) World catalogue of the genus-group names in Elateridae (Insecta, Coleoptera). Part I: Agrypninae, Campyloxeninae, Hemiopinae, Lissominae, Oestodinae, Parablacinae, Physodactylinae, Pityobiinae, Subprotelaterinae, Tetralobinae. ZooKeys 839: 83–154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.839.33279.

Sánchez-Ruiz A (1996) Catálogo bibliográfico de las especies de la familia Elateridae (Coleoptera) de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. In: Ramos MA (Ed.) Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 2. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 265 pp.

 

Posted by beetledude almost 2 years ago

@borisb

Are you up to fixing this? I don't want to, since (a) I know nothing of Elateridae; (b) this genus doesn't occur in the Afrotropics.

Riaan

Posted by beetledude almost 2 years ago
Posted by beetledude almost 2 years ago

Uhhh . . .

Posted by borisb almost 2 years ago

the genus Conoderus is a mess now and most of (at least North American) genera will go to other/new genera. In North America, only C. falli (if I remember correctly) will stay in Monocrepidius. I say leave it alone for now until a formal revision is ever done

Posted by bmathison almost 2 years ago

This should be fixed. Ignoring the problem jut causes more chaos and confusion. Wikipedia and GBIF have already switched over. iNaturalist and BugGuide have not, leaving usage split. Waiting for a revision could mean waiting 100 years.

Posted by zygy almost 2 years ago

Type species of Monocrepidius is pallipes Eschscholtz, 1829 [Japan: Ivo Jima; Ozeania];
that of Conoderus the well characterized fuscofasciatus Eschscholtz, 1829 [Brazil]

The reversal of synonymy by Kundrata et al. is surprising; page priority on same page?
The Eschscholtz source not available online, apparently a rara issue:
https://www.worldcat.org/title/entomologisches-archiv/oclc/1568042

Posted by borisb almost 2 years ago

I see this is a pain! The Australian Faunal Directory has now changed Conoderus to Monocrepidius (though misspelt at Monocrepidus). Can the Australian Conoderus be transferred to Monocrepidius?

Posted by lauriecookson over 1 year ago

"Wikipedia and GBIF have already switched over."

Partly. GBIF still has Conoderus, too: https://www.gbif.org/species/1162038 though there is no system behind it / reference for that.

To my knowledge, there has never been a time past 1829, when the names were not understood as meaning the same division.

Catalogus coleopterorum (1869) used Monocrepidius, and with this, at least the largest part of Australian taxa were combined originally
[I found one orig. Conoderus of Elston, 1930].

Posted by borisb 5 months ago

swap-ready now. Have checked any whether is/was combined with Conoderus/Monocrepidius, and already fixed those from Australia, or going to other genera.

Name templates under output taxon prepared, except for three formal taxa from North America
[will stay combined with Conoderus, extra problems]

Posted by borisb 5 months ago

Now executed, after check-up of observations
(under both names, swap = improvement):
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/135786

Posted by borisb 5 months ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments