Flagger Content Author Content Reason Flag Created Resolved by Resolution
matthew_connors bobby23 Idiosepiids (Order Idiosepiida)

duplicate taxon

Jul. 18, 2022 12:09:48 +0000 thomaseverest

Swap done

Comments

Same taxon as this one - which is the correct spelling?

Posted by matthew_connors almost 2 years ago

Swap drafted - I assume that's correct?

Posted by reiner almost 2 years ago

Yes that looks good to me

Posted by matthew_connors almost 2 years ago

There is already a deviation for this taxon.
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/848687-Idiosepiida/taxonomy_details

It would be best to look at that source first. @bobby23

Posted by thomaseverest almost 2 years ago

@reiner this is an intentional deviation sourced from Hanlon et al. (2018) and I’d prefer it be kept.

They are not duplicated taxa - Idiosepiida is just a monofamilial order.

Posted by bobby23 almost 2 years ago

Upon further (admittedly light) review, I think I misinterpreted the issue here and I apologize. I thought the order was going to be merged with its family, as WoRMS previously had the family ungrafted to any order. Hanlon et al. (2018) formally recognized the family under its own order, but it looks like WoRMS is now recognizing one under a different spelling. A think a swap bringing us closer to WoRMS in this context is fine.

Posted by bobby23 almost 2 years ago

So this swap shouldn't happen?
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/112163

But we should swap Idiosepiida with Idiosepida?

Posted by thomaseverest almost 2 years ago

@bobby23 Should we swap Idiosepiida for Idiosepida?

Posted by thomaseverest over 1 year ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments