Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
matthew_connors | bobby23 | Idiosepiids (Order Idiosepiida) |
duplicate taxon |
Jul. 18, 2022 12:09:48 +0000 | thomaseverest |
Swap done |
badly grafted - should be a family
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1454586
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153037
Swap drafted - I assume that's correct?
There is already a deviation for this taxon.
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/848687-Idiosepiida/taxonomy_details
It would be best to look at that source first. @bobby23
@reiner this is an intentional deviation sourced from Hanlon et al. (2018) and I’d prefer it be kept.
They are not duplicated taxa - Idiosepiida is just a monofamilial order.
Upon further (admittedly light) review, I think I misinterpreted the issue here and I apologize. I thought the order was going to be merged with its family, as WoRMS previously had the family ungrafted to any order. Hanlon et al. (2018) formally recognized the family under its own order, but it looks like WoRMS is now recognizing one under a different spelling. A think a swap bringing us closer to WoRMS in this context is fine.
So this swap shouldn't happen?
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/112163
But we should swap Idiosepiida with Idiosepida?
@bobby23 Should we swap Idiosepiida for Idiosepida?
Same taxon as this one - which is the correct spelling?