lumped into E. viscosa in POWO
split
Read Peterson et al. for a discussion on this: https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/36047/Paul%20Peterson%20-%20Peterson%20etal%202018_Proposal%20to%20reject%20the%20name%20Poa%20amabilis%20%28Eragrostis%20amabilis%29%20%28Poaceae%29_Taxon%2067_644-645.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Almost all observations on iNat would fall into the concept of E. tenella adopted by POWO, and it seems that we should swap in that direction.
DO NOT SWAP THIS INTO E. VISCOSA.
About
Help
Forum
Press
Jobs
Our Blog
Community Guidelines
Terms of Use
Privacy
Read Peterson et al. for a discussion on this: https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/36047/Paul%20Peterson%20-%20Peterson%20etal%202018_Proposal%20to%20reject%20the%20name%20Poa%20amabilis%20%28Eragrostis%20amabilis%29%20%28Poaceae%29_Taxon%2067_644-645.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Almost all observations on iNat would fall into the concept of E. tenella adopted by POWO, and it seems that we should swap in that direction.
DO NOT SWAP THIS INTO E. VISCOSA.