August 25, 2026

Eupatorium rotundifolium and friends

Anyone who has taken the time to look more closely at Eupatorium knows that this genus can be very diverse and variable. In particular, the E. rotundifolium complex is quite confusing and often misidentified here on iNat. Rightfully so, as the group includes many instances of polyploidy and hybridization. This is my attempt at giving fellow iNatters a guide to better understand E. rotundifolium and related species.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Let’s start off with the most widespread species and diploid progenitor of the other species in the group: E. rotundifolium! This species exists mostly as polyploid apomicts across the majority of its range, but the plants around northern FL/southern GA are sexual and diploid, thus presumably one of the parents of each of the other species in the complex.

The leaf bases are usually obviously truncate; you can almost trace a straight line along the base of the leaves. The tip of the leaf is also quite rounded, as are the teeth (or serrations) along the leaf edges. The 3 main veins of the leaf separate at the base of the leaf.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Next, we’ll look at E. scabridum. This is a species of hybrid origin, sometimes a sterile hybrid and sometimes fertile, thought to have as its parents E. rotundifolium and E. semiserratum. It is widespread, though not as frequent as its parents.

The leaf bases are broadly cuneate, forming a sort of wide V shape at the base. The E. rotundifolium parentage is apparent in the rounded serrations along the edges, although these are somewhat sharper than in the parent. The leaf tip is also sharper, and the leaf has a narrower outline. The 3 main veins of the leaf separate a bit above the base of the leaf. Importantly, this species has axillary fascicles, which are small bundles of leaves present at the leaf-stem junction.

I had trouble finding type material for E. scabridum, but this link will take you to a page with a specimen of E. scabridum (next to a specimen of E. pubescens) from the Elliott collection. Stephen Elliot described E. scabridum. https://www.charlestonmuseum.org/research/collection/eupatorium-rotundifolium-var-ovatum/A02C6F60-B582-4B88-80A8-282514100220
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

E. pubescens is also a hybrid species. It is thought to have originated from E. rotundifolium and E. sessilifolium, but now has self-sustaining populations. It was formerly known as E. rotundifolium var. ovatum.

The leaf bases are broadly rounded. The serrations along the leaf edges are quite neatly organized and smaller than in the other species. I’ve found that this tends to make this plants leaves look entire when seen from a distance. The tip of the leaf is notably pointed. The 3 main veins of the leaf separate a bit above the base of the leaf. There are no axillary fascicles present here.

Attached below is the type sheet for E. pubescens.

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

E. cordigerum is a species I haven’t seen yet, supposedly a hybrid of E. rotundifolium and E. perfoliatum. From the type sheet attached above, it seems that the leaves are longer and more rugose than in any of the other species listed here. Keys also say that the leaves are clasping, but E. pubescens can also look like it has clasping leaves sometimes.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Finally, I’ll end off with a mysterious entity that I’m not even sure descends from E. rotundifolium. I’m including it here because it can key to E. pubescens. It was first noticed by my friend @piedmontplants, who found it in several spots in Alabama. @danielrohrabaugh and I subsequently found it at two more locations in Georgia. It has a resemblance to E. semiserratum, from which it may well be descended, but has short to nonexistent petioles and serrations that extend further down the leaf. It also has prominent axillary fascicles.

Posted on August 25, 2026 01:37 AM by junior_bartram | 10 comments | Leave a comment

March 17, 2026

Dandelions in Georgia

Why did I disagree with your dandelion ID? Because dandelions require a very specific set of photos as well as extensive familiarity with taxa to reach a conclusive species-level ID. We actually have a LOT more than just "common" and "red-seeded" dandelions!

Taraxacum speciate using a method called apomixis, which means that a polyploid individual can become functionally sterile and reproduce asexually by producing seeds that contain identical genetic material to the parent plant. Sometimes, these apomicts even lose the ability to produce pollen altogether! Sexually reproducing diploids in the genus do exist, but they are quite range-restricted and not to be expected here.

Apomixis is also not unique to dandelions. Hawthorns (Crataegus spp.), blackberries (Rubus spp.) and bonesets (Eupatorium spp.) also frequently undergo apomictic speciation. Many of these apomicts are widely recognized as full species by North American botanical authorities, so why not extend the treatment to dandelions? Diversity in Taraxacum has long been overlooked here, largely based on the simplification committed by most NA botanical authorities regarding the taxonomy of this group.

There is quite impressive native diversity in the alpine and arctic regions of North America, but all the dandelions in Georgia are introduced species from Europe. These myriad species are usually grouped into just T. officinale and T. erythrospermum, neither of which should occur here (one is an invalid name, the other is a sexual diploid). There are already various people working to catalog this missing diversity information across various parts of North America, but to my knowledge nobody is working on this topic here in Georgia. This is my attempt at contributing to both North American taraxacology and general knowledge of Georgia’s flora by collecting relevant resources and advice in this post.

-

Link to my project of identifiable observations of dandelions in Georgia: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/dandelions-of-georgia

-

Here is my list of recommended photos to take to have a shot at reaching a species level ID:

  1. Closeup of open flower head from above: assesses presence of pollen and color of stigmas

  2. Closeup of open flower head from the side: assesses outer bract coloration, shape, and positioning, as well as glaucescence and ligule striping

  3. Closeup of seeds: assesses color, ornamentation, and cone length

  4. Photo of unopened flower bud: assesses color

  5. Photos of front and back of fresh leaves removed as close to base as possible: assesses lobing/teeth shapes and positioning, petioles and midrib coloration, presence of wings, and various other traits. If leaves are heterophyllous, which they often are, remove a few that you feel are visually representative of the plant

  6. Closeup of midrib, if you suspect it is one of the striped plants (sect. Hamata and sect. Celtica)

  7. General habit photo of the plant, showing the entire plant where you found it, in as appropriate lighting as possible

-

Here is my key to sections I've found in Georgia so far:

1 Outer bracts erect; occurring in acidic habitats..……………......................……….…………….......………...…….….….……Spectabilia
1 Outer bracts spreading to reflexed; habitats various
--2 Petioles with very conspicuous interwoven red and green strands
----3 Leaves dark bottle-green……………………….....….....………...……………….….………..................………….……………........…Hamata
----3 Leaves light green……………….…………………….....…………….....…………….......…...……...….............….....………….….….…..Celtica
--2 Petioles without (or with inconspicuous) interwoven strands; petioles variously green, white, or pink
----4 Unopened flower buds blackish; outer bracts linear-lanceolate and often heavily reflexed…………..….…..........Borea
----4 Unopened flower buds greenish; outer bracts spreading to recurved
------5 Plants usually quite small and prostrate; seeds cinnamon-colored to red………………....…….........…...Erythrosperma
------5 Plants usually large; seeds brown to straw-colored………………….............…….……..………..…….......................Taraxacum


Couplet 1: erect outer bracts


Couplet 1: spreading outer bracts


Couplet 2: prominent interwoven red and green strands on the midrib


Couplet 2: inconspicuous weaving, a confusing trait found in some sect. Taraxacum species


Couplet 4: blackish bud of sect. Borea


Couplet 4: skinny, reflexed outer bracts of sect. Borea


Couplet 4: greenish bud

Posted on March 17, 2026 12:48 AM by junior_bartram | 4 comments | Leave a comment

Archives