Project Rules, Inclusion Criteria, and FAQs

We have received some good questions about whether or not a given observation should qualify for inclusion in the project. To make our rules more explicit, we're outlining them here. If you are still unsure whether your observation qualifies, feel free to ask in the comments below.

RULES
The goal of this project is to identify the non-captive/non-cultivated species that can be found in a newly formed ecosystem: the interior of human habitations.

1. Be in a habitation: a habitation is any structure built by people with walls and a roof. In many regions, such habitations are relatively impermeable to, say, rat-sized organisms, but in some regions, habitations are more open. Since it’s a “habitation,” people have to be in it, at least occasionally, so structures that have been abandoned for years don't count. At the same time, portions of habitations rarely entered by people but closely associated with places we do enter (the attic or crawlspace of a home, the space beneath floorboards etc.) should count. This definition is inclusive of most traditional habitations (mud brick, thatch-roof, etc.) as well, which, while more permeable to the outside than drywall and shingles, are still mostly self-contained.

2. Be in the interior: the "interior” means the organism can’t just be on the exterior walls, or in close proximity to the structure. It has to be inside the threshold.

3. Must be found in: There are two groups of indoor organisms: those that are exploiting resources inside and making indoor living a facet of their natural history (i.e., “residents”) and those that happen into the indoors (i.e., “tourists”). The first group is particularly relevant to questions of adaptation and evolution, while the latter group includes organisms relevant to human experience and disease exposure. For Never Home Alone, we are interested in both groups. This is partly a result of the fact that the boundary between these groups is fuzzy. In addition, it is very challenging to discern which group an organism is in based solely on a photo (e.g., are the dead flies on the windowsill trapped tourists or did they pupate from fruit in the cupboard, mate, and then die, having passed on their genes?) Thus, any observation of an organism indoors that wasn’t deliberately brought indoors by people should count, even if that organism doesn’t seem to “want” to be inside.

4. Must be non-captive/non-cultivated: Basically no pets/houseplants. Observation doesn’t necessarily have to follow iNaturalist’s definition of “wild,” which says that “wild” organisms are independently surviving/reproducing. That is, a non-native species that enters the home via a box of fruit would not be considered “wild” by iNaturalist if there were no records of it having a successfully reproducing population in that area. We would still want such an observation for Never Home Alone, even if iNaturalist doesn’t consider it to be wild.

FAQs
Do pets/potted plants qualify?
No

Do wild organisms associated with pets/potted plants qualify (e.g., fleas, flies hatching from potting soil, etc.)?
Yes

Does the observation have to be in a house, specifically?
No, other human habitations like offices, warehouses, airports, hotels etc. also qualify

Do observations in gardens, porches, streets, and other outdoor areas qualify?
No, these observations are not indoors

Do observations of organisms brought inside by humans qualify (e.g., a dragonfly that landed on your backpack during a hike, that you inadvertently brought inside)?
Observations of organisms deliberately brought inside by people do not count (e.g., a bug you brought inside to get better light for a photo), though I suppose there could be an edge case where people routinely bring certain organisms inside in such a way that it’s a part of the indoors experience. Observations of organisms inadvertently brought inside by people should generally count (e.g., worms in your apples), though there are likewise probably exceptions (a dragonfly that landed on your backpack during a hike, that you inadvertently brought inside isn’t really in the spirit of the project).

Do organisms on the exterior walls of a habitation qualify?
No, these observations are not indoors

Do interior courtyards qualify?
Not if the courtyard is open air (open to the sky)

Do traditional home types (mud brick, grass thatch roof, etc.) qualify?
Yes. Perhaps note in the comments if the observation is from a traditional home type

Do molds/fungi qualify (e.g. fungal infections of citrus fruits)?
Yes, similar situation to fleas

Do attics, basements, crawlspaces, sheds, outhouses etc. qualify?
Yes, they are indoor extensions of the primary human habitation even if people rarely enter them

Do garages qualify?
If the garage is usually closed then yes, if it’s mostly open then no

Do RVs/other “motorized habitations” qualify?
Yes

Do observations from greenhouses qualify?
The plants in the greenhouse do not qualify (they are captive/cultivated). Wild organisms associated with those plants (lizards, snails, etc.) do qualify, but please note in the comments if the observation comes from a greenhouse (large greenhouses are rather different from the typical human habitations we are interested in)

Do observations from a barn qualify?
Most barns are permeable enough that we wouldn’t consider them a habitation, as defined above

Do plants qualify?
Almost never. A few users have submitted observations of fish tank algae, which do qualify. But situations in which a wild plant is growing indoors would seem exceptionally rare. A user did note that you sometimes get weeds in greenhouses. I suppose a greenhouse weed would qualify.

Do insects that were collected outside but were brought inside to be pinned and stored in a collection qualify?
Definitely not!

Posted on April 10, 2024 07:32 PM by bradleyallf bradleyallf

Comments

Finally, a grand unified theory of the indoors! I'm going to add "something the cat dragged in" to the no pile. Unless it's the unintentional prize of a feral cat that lives in the courtyard of my greenhouse barn.

Posted by jellyturtle 21 days ago

would an structure in a park count as indoor (equipment shed/restaurant/ public bathroom) ?
it is not a home, nor is it a place of "habitation" , however it is a closed to the environment and can be a home for some creatures , mostly arthropods. I have documented arthropods from structures in parks and natural reserves. This may be a bit fuzzy since they can include organisms that are usually found outside, but happened to find a protected spot in the structure.

Posted by guryonatan 21 days ago

@jellyturtle that makes sense! Perhaps I should amend FAQ #5 to include things deliberately brought in by people OR pets...

@guryonatan structures in a park qualify! See FAQ #3. Perhaps the connotation of "habitation" is still too house-focused, maybe we should use a term like "enclosed human structure" or similar... Also see Rule #3; it's ok if it doesn't seem like the organism is living inside, or even if it seems like the organism just got trapped inside. We want all observations of indoor organisms. Good questions!

Posted by bradleyallf 20 days ago

I had posted a beetle found on my 80% enclosed/roofed patio, which I think is still too open to the outside as detailed above, so I removed it from the project. However, this was such an interesting read! I had never thought about the distinction before between "residents" and "tourists" and hadn't thought of the critters "exploiting" me to survive--except for the hated mosquitos. But spiders, for example, I don't think of as exploiting my resources since I know they eat other annoying bugs. Perhaps they're more like "working animals," like feral cats farmers keep around their barns to keep rodents away.

Posted by revz 20 days ago

I adore the designation of inadvertent visitors as "tourists" and will adopt this vocabulary in my general life. (There's a bee in the house! Don't kill it, it's just a trapped tourist and wants back out.)

Thanks for the well-written, clearly thought out, and amusing guidelines!

Posted by rosawoodsii 20 days ago

I LOVE the idea of indoor spiders as working animals @revz. And then we have our bee tourist per @rosawoodsii. What are we missing... dogs as trojan horses for fleas?

Posted by bradleyallf 20 days ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments