There is a great number of seashell species posted to iNaturalist as fragments and many of them can be identified to species. Learning how to identify fragments forces one to look at tiny details that are usually not worth analyzing when other indicators are present. This can be a fun way to challenge your ID skills! Unfortunately, it didn’t make it to the list of new annotations, but ...more ↓
There is a great number of seashell species posted to iNaturalist as fragments and many of them can be identified to species. Learning how to identify fragments forces one to look at tiny details that are usually not worth analyzing when other indicators are present. This can be a fun way to challenge your ID skills! Unfortunately, it didn’t make it to the list of new annotations, but that’s okay, that’s why we have projects!
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/seashell-fragment-project/50201
Definitions (please tell me if you think they need improvement)
All categories: There should be little to no tissue left in the fragment (for the sake of being a shell). Freshwater mollusks are welcome even though they’re not“sea” shells but just shells.
Bivalve shells: at least 50% of the shell is missing (50% of one of the two valves)
Snail shells: the shell lacks a complete or undamaged spiral. I’d like to lump operculum in here.
Limpet & Slippersnail shells: at least 50% is missing.
Chiton shells: isolated plate
Tusk shells: does not make a complete tube
Sand dollar & sea urchin shells: at least 50% is missing. I’m lumping in teeth and spines here.
Crab & barnacle shells: single limb or isolated carapace (again, almost no tissue present aside from ligaments)
Not counted:
Coral and bryozoans: are colonial so don’t really have distinct fragments
less ↑