New taxon change

Taxonomic Changes

Change types
Clear filters

Taxonomic Swap 142923 (Draft)

unknown
Yes
Added by zebs on May 6, 2024 10:35 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142922 (Draft)

unknown
Added by victor_85 on May 6, 2024 09:58 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142920 (Draft)

unknown
Added by victor_85 on May 6, 2024 08:30 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142917 (Draft)

Duplicate with malformed name

unknown
Added by lwnrngr on May 5, 2024 06:22 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142915 (Draft)

Las subespecie nominal se elevo a especie.

Butterfly classification and species ... (Citation)
Yes
Added by hugoalvarezg on May 4, 2024 10:13 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Stage 142914 (Draft)

La subespecie nominal, se elevo a especie.

Butterfly classification and species ... (Citation)
Added by hugoalvarezg on May 4, 2024 10:09 PM
staged

Taxonomic Merge 142913 (Draft)

Supported by POWO and E+M.org aswel as many national data bases.

POWO (Citation)
Added by kelian_gtr on May 4, 2024 09:14 PM
merged into

Taxonomic Swap 142912 (Draft)

unknown
Added by mayconu7 on May 4, 2024 08:51 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142910 (Draft)

unknown
Added by joseph92 on May 3, 2024 10:16 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Drop 142909 (Draft)

This is an invalid taxon. I find 1 vague reference to Dicercomyson vernerae Demoulin, 1964, but Kluge does not have this genus in his worldwide taxonomy and I have no idea what happened to it.

unknown
Added by joseph92 on May 3, 2024 10:13 PM
dropped

Taxonomic Swap 142907 (Draft)

unknown
Added by rstlaurent on May 3, 2024 03:42 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142906 (Draft)

As discussed here, it sounds like POWO got a little ahead of itself and accepted a split of T. ovatum into T. ovatum, T. crassifolium, and T. scouleri based on an informal conversation with the authors of a forthcoming study. The study authors then proposed a similar but different split, into T. stenosepalum (which POWO treats as a synonym of T. ovatum ovatum, currently). Strangely enough, this apparently resulted in the published study effectively saying inat was making up taxonomy by having T. scouleri, unaware that we only have the taxon because POWO does.

The situation is kind of messy, so we are going to lump T. scouleri back into T. ovatum and let the primary literature/POWO figure it out, then reassess the situation on inat when and if necessary. Little to no ID information will be lost in the lump because the split T. ovatum and T. stenosepalum are effectively allopatric, but because the name T. ovatum var. stenosepalum is valid we may as well just activate it in case anyone wants it for the purposes of studying the ramifications of the split.

unknown
Added by wildskyflower on May 3, 2024 02:23 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142904 (Draft)

orthographic error

unknown
Added by kevinfaccenda on May 2, 2024 11:54 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Merge 142903 (Draft)

Bellis & Donaldson. 2016. Reassessment of some of Kirkaldy’s Australian species of Delphacini (Hemiptera: Delphacidae: Delphacinae). Austral Entomology 55: 247–260.

unknown
Yes
Added by wongun on May 2, 2024 06:49 PM
merged into

Taxonomic Swap 142901 (Draft)

Floccifera is a synonym of Athetis

Moths of Thailand 3(2) Noctuoidea (Citation)
Yes
Added by hkmoths on May 1, 2024 06:46 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142899 (Draft)

POWO (Citation)
Added by convallaria1128 on April 30, 2024 05:24 PM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142896 (Draft)

genus Melinda is INVALID, because it is preoccupied by Melinda Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Diptera) and therefore must be re-named. I have no indication that this has happened yet. In the meantime, the previous genus affiliation should be used

unknown
Yes
Added by amzamz on April 30, 2024 09:05 AM
replaced with

Taxonomic Swap 142895 (Draft)

wrong way round, but it doesn't really matter
see original spelling at
https://archive.org/details/novitateszoolog231916roth/page/267/mode/1up?view=theater

unknown
Yes
Added by amzamz on April 30, 2024 06:15 AM
replaced with