Flag for Taxon: vervains (Genus Verbena)
| Flagger | Content Author | Content | Reason | Flag Created | Resolved by | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inao_vasquez | vervains (Genus Verbena) |
It seems is missing one species Verbena corymbosa. Source: KEW plant list of the World. It is the only accepted and synonym of Glandularia corymbosa. http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:865121-1 |
Feb. 18, 2021 13:56:59 +0000 | tonyrebelo |
unsatisfactorily in limbo |
Comments
I guess. What does mean taxonomic area.
Glandularia lobata is also a synonym of other species that does not distributes in Chile.
But Verbena corymbosa is a chilean species not listed yet in INaturalist. Please see the source for the references and publications
V. corymbosa is included in the names of G. lobata lobata. If it is its own species, then all the taxa included need to be looked at.
Yes, please. It seems to me are two different species
G. lobata lobata is listed in iNaturalist but does not appear in the International Plant Name Index (IPNI) used by Kew.
G. lobata is listed in iNaturalist and in IPNI-Kew is recognized as a synonym of Verbena lobata (accepted species). http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/60456542-2
Verbena lobata lobata is also listed in iNaturalist. This variety is accepted, and its native range is SE. & S. Brazil to N. Argentina. It has a synonym V. corymbosa Cham. which probably is origin of the mistake.
BUT. Verbena corymbosa Ruiz & Pav. is other Taxon. This species is accepted, and its native range is Central & S. Chile, S. Brazil to Uruguay. This Is the species i'm requesting to include in iNaturalist. http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:865121-1
How it should be done? I have to add another flag?
No need to make another flag, I'll do this once I have time or another curator can step in if I don't get it done soon.
Please see: https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/405708
For the time being please use https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1193284-Glandularia-corymbosa
Since the other flag will address this, I will close this flag. Please address your concerns at
https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/405708
ok tony.
wow the problem rose to the whole gender
It is marked as a synonym of this species. Should this taxonomic area be redone?