Journal archives for March 2014

March 5, 2014

Habitat Trips

For this hike, I went to a unique spot in the Berkeley hills that included a north facing slope, a south facing slope, and an flat area at the top of the hill that acted as a type of crossover between Moist Evergreen and Chaparral. I started in the Moist Evergreen forest, where I first noticed that I no longer heard any birds. After giving up on finding a bird, I decided to look below logs and inside them, where I found an interesting little worm that seemed adapted to a log so moist that it could be broken apart with the touch of a finger (almost to the point of soil). I then found multiple plants with darker leaves that seemed to be adapted to the lack of sunlight and dampness of the forest, but couldn't think of much else in common with them due to disparities in leaf shape and size. Next, I moved to the Chaparral area where I began to hear the birds again. After looking in the trees and failing to find a photographable bird, I looked below and found a bird in the a low chaparral bush of some kind. The bird, of course, moved when I came near, but I realized it was using the plant for protection. I found a variety of lichen/fungi on tree trunks that looked remarkably dryer and reduced in color when compared to the moss and lichen I found in the Moist Evergreen forest. Moreover, the plants that I found in the Chaparral also seemed to have generally less saturated color than the Moist Evergreen ones. The big find of the hike, however, was a green slug with black spots -- definitely the largest slug I have seen to date and will be excited to see if it can be ID'd.

Posted on March 5, 2014 06:41 AM by rtdecca rtdecca | 14 observations | 0 comments | Leave a comment

March 19, 2014

Characters and traits

For this homework, I decided to focus on the diversity in leaf and stem traits in native, vascular plants at the Anthony Chabot Regional Park in Alameda. The first plant I came across was a flowering plant with ivy-like leaves, while the second was a vascular plant with very thin, furry leaves and a bluish color -- an amazing tribute to the biodiversity here when two plants so different can grow feet apart. The other flowering plants I came across, by comparison, had similar traits to the first in that they were low-growing with wide leaves and small flowers (though there was a variance in amount of petals). Throughout the hike I came across many of the usual suspects for a chaparral biome. They were shrubs with spiky, wide leaves used for protection against herbivores, and I would often see birds using their insides for protection (although the birds were too quick to catch a shot of). Two of the standout vascular plants had thin, bright leaves that seemed to contrast the darker, wider, and possibly spiked leaves I saw in the chaparral biome of the Chabot Regional Park. I can only assume that these plants have other traits (such as one of them that had spiked stems) to protect their leaves from herbivores. One other plant I came across was actually dead but was a flowering plant with very thin leaves, a greater amount of flowers than any of the others in the area, and no spikes or any visible protection. I could only assume that this plant was either not in season, or not native/adapted to the area because its traits were so unlike the others -- but hopefully we will see if an when the plant is ID'ed. Overall, it was very interesting to see the common traits that the plants in the Chabot Regional Park's chaparral biome evolved in order to protect themselves and survive.

Posted on March 19, 2014 06:23 AM by rtdecca rtdecca | 12 observations | 0 comments | Leave a comment

March 20, 2014

Natural History Story

http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/574982

When I came across this Drew's Silky Lupine, I was particularly fascinated by how different it was than the plants surrounding it. I first assumed that it wasn't native to the area because of its silky, greyish-green thin leaves that contrasted the green, broad (sometimes spiked) leaves around it. However, after it was identified, I found that it is actually a California native plant that is common to both California and Oregon (Level 5 - Secure, so not endangered neither nationally nor globally). It is found in the Sierra Nevada, but also in coastal ranges in Northern California and mountainous forests of Southern Oregon -- so it is adapted to high elevation, dry climate, and mountainous habitat. Its leaves are silky during pubescence, and I'm assuming the plant that I found was very early in its growth because of its size and the fact that it showed no sign of flowering yet.

Surprisingly, Drew's Silky Lupine is part of the pea family, and grows pods of 2 to 4 centimeters containing 3 to 6 seeds.

I tried to find any information on EOL, Wikipedia, Google Books, and Google Scholar on why it was called Drew's Silky Lupine, but had no luck finding any history on the plant -- only matter-of-fact listings of its characteristics.

After searching JSTOR, though, I did find an article in a bulletin published in June 1889 by the Torrey Botanical Club called "The Botany of Humboldt County, California," by E.R. Drew. Under "New Species and Varieties," he lists "Lupinus Adsurgens" which is what we now call Drew's Silky Lupine, and also lists its characteristics. So, by finding this article, I realized that the plant was discovered on July 10th, 1888 in "ponds at Jarnigan's, on Mad River," in Humboldt County, CA by E.R. Drew, and this is why we have the name Drew's Silky Lupine.

Posted on March 20, 2014 02:38 AM by rtdecca rtdecca | 0 comments | Leave a comment

Archives