Shows same stripe at the rear of the scape as this individual. If ID correct, then new for the park

Edit. This is a female as pointed out by John Ascher, so my reference to the other individual (which was supposed to be linked by a hyperlink) is incorrect anyway and also in error, as the pale stripe is not visible either. (Two errors in one ID: that may be a new record on my part. Doh!)

Nevertheless, this is still a new species for the park, albeit a different one, so heads up @neilvinson and @laura_clarke