Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Pipile. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Pipile cumanensis 2108
Pipile. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Pipile cumanensis 2108
Taxonomic Split 116187
(Committed on 2023-01-23)
|
|
split into |
|
Comments
@loarie Thoughts before we commit this one? I've updated range maps, though our range maps are going to differ a little from Clements because I cannot find an iNat obs of grayi in Peru, nor are there any in eBird. The new maps are approx. where one species transfer to another.
Problem is, even with the atlas, La Paz, Bolivia has both species so how do we prevent those from being bumped to genus?
This looks good to me
its fine to coarsen some IDs, based on 'analyze IDs' this looks good to me
Number of IDs Destination Atlas
540 Pipile cumanensis Atlased
376 Pipile grayi Atlased
24 Pipile Outside of all atlases
22 Pipile Overlapping atlases
I agree, this is fine to commit, there are only 7 wild obs in the overlap area
Even atlases mapped, 70 observations may be bumped to genus level due to states with having both species.