There seems to be no consensus as to the parent species that should constitute a hybrid of this name. As a result, this name is applied to the hybrids of a number of species, and therefore variations on this name cannot be accepted as a taxon here on iNat.
Please mark "No, it's as good as it can be" under "Based on the evidence, can the Community Taxon still be confirmed or improved?" in the DQA to make observations of hybrid taxa at genus level become Research Grade (unless the specific combination of parent species of a specimen has been assigned a name).
I didn't realize Callianthe was carved out from Abutilon in POWO/iNat. @loarie would you mind reversing this merge so A. hybridum/A. x hybridum can be put into Callianthe?
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
The assumed hybrid formula is Callianthe darwinii × Callianthe picta so should that not go to the genus Callianthe rather than Abutilon?