just adding a link to the longer explanation from hobiecat about how this affects C. rubricata since most of the IDs do not go to the subspecies level and were not automatically updated. will be updating for the regional split (along the Rio Grande) manually.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
just adding a link to the longer explanation from hobiecat about how this affects C. rubricata since most of the IDs do not go to the subspecies level and were not automatically updated. will be updating for the regional split (along the Rio Grande) manually.