Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Gymnopilus junonius. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Gymnopilus junonius 83196
Gymnopilus junonius. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Gymnopilus junonius 83196
Taxonomic Split 85854
(Committed on 2020-12-01)
|
|
split into |
|
@cooperj, tough one to atlas. Other than Asia and North America, it seems like the right name is G. junonius at the moment, so those should stay. For North America, though, there are at least four ENA species, one of which is also present in the PNW. It isn't clear what the extents of the ranges of those species are, so it might be best at the moment to just leave it so all G. junonius in North America gets swapped to Complex G. junonius. The only (maybe) exception would possibly be California, Oregon, and Washington, since it isn't clear that more than G. ventricosus is present there. Still, with G. voitkii in British Columbia, it is possible...