Taxonomic Swap 92505
(Draft)
|
|
replaced with |
|
Comments
@loarie, is it possible to roll back this and some other changes that weren't quite correct? Or should corrections be made by just moving forward?
OK I'll revert this. @aleturkmen can you mention me on your next draft taxon change before you commit to avoid having to do any more big reverts - happy to help take a look and discuss before committing - thanks!
@loarie, just wanted to send a ping on this one to see if the reversion is still in the works. Sorry for all the tags lately! I so appreciate all the help you provide!
sorry forgot about this one - reverting now
reverted
Why was this swapped? Telegonus anaphus is still a valid taxon and the older name, but it was split into anausis and anaphus. This should have been a split, if anausis is going to be treated as a species. See: https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/The-Taxonomic-Report_8-7_0001-0041.pdf
For the sources for your taxon changes, please cite the paper or taxonomic authority that is the basis for the change.