Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Pterostylis. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Pterostylis nana 487293
I am confused as to the nature of your complaint; as far as I can tell, it did not affect your observations of Pterostylis nana as they were not in Western Australia, and you have no identifications for it to have affected. What is the problem?
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
What does a Harvard mycologist know about Australian orchid? Can I opt out of this taxon change pls?