We need help with IDs please: our identifications are progressing at a snails pace.
Summaries - just before Midnight on Friday night:
.* Birds - 4,957 observations of 191 species. RG: 4,504 (91%)
.* Herps - 955 observations of 48 species. RG: 870 (91%)
.* Mammals - 744 observations of 49 species. RG: 466 (62%)
.* Fish -391 observations of 67 species. RG: 231 (59%)
.* Molluscs - 1,797 observations of 210 species. RG: 862 (48%)
.* Insects - 3,238 observations of 389 species. RG: 1,057 (33%)
.* Arachnids - 872 observations of 97 species. RG: 260 (30%)
.* Monocots - 5,873 observations of 484 species. RG: 1,010 (39%)
.* Dicots - 24,618 observations of 1,962 species. RG: 7,954 (29%)
.* Fungi - 746 observations of 120 species. RG: 51 (7%)
.* Marine - 5249 observations of 700 species. RG: 2,818 (54%)
Of our 63,210 observations - our observations by rank:
.* 12,980 observations (21%) dont have any Identifications at all
.* 3,238 observations (5%) have an ID above family level
.* 3,038 observations (5%) have an ID at Family or Tribe level
.* 9,269 observations (15%) have an ID at Genus level
.* 34,557 observations (55%) have an ID to species level
These are roughly as by state of identificaiton:
.* 12,980 observations (21%) dont have any Identifications at all
.* 6,791 observations (11%) are casual grade (planted/captive or missing information)
.* 24,308 observations (38%) have an ID but need it refined or confirmed.
.* 19,212 observations (30%) are Research Grade.
So we still have a gargantuan task over the next 50 hours.
Comments
To put this in perspective. With 34,500 observations identified to species level - this is more observations identified than observed by any, except the top three other, cities.
Neck and neck with Hong Kong for second place now. Our ... 42 versus their ... 45! species
Can anyone help with this? I have looked at a few that I def know and selected agree? Not sure how it works
liezelg
@liezelg - what do you mean?
Please see here: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/city-nature-challenge-2022-city-of-cape-town/journal/65505-please-help-with-identifications
Does this help you? It sounds that you might be most useful for "Second Pass" and "Specialists".
25 Hours to go ....
.* Birds - RG: 4,663 out of 5,137 observations (91%)
.* Herps - RG: 929 out of 1,018 observations (91%)
.* Fish - RG: 301 out of 429 observations (70%)
.* Mammals - RG: 490 out of 777 observations (63%)
.* Molluscs - RG: 1,172 out of 1,973 observations (59%)
.* Insects - RG: 1,179 out of 3,515 observations (34%)
.* Arachnids - RG: 282 out of 943 observations (30%)
.* Dicots - RG: 9,312 out of 26,455 observations (35%)
.* Monocots - RG: 1,316 out of 6,245 observations (21%)
.* Fungi - RG: 66 out of 853 observations (8%)
.* Marine - RG: 3,969 out of 5,472 observations (73%)
Of our 64,700 observations - our observations by rank:
.* 10,970 observations (17%) dont have any Identifications at all
.* 3,494 observations (5%) have an ID above family level
.* 3,359 observations (5%) have an ID at Family or Tribe level
.* 10,037 observations (16%) have an ID at Genus level
.* 36,938 observations (57%) have an ID to species level
These are roughly as by state of identificaiton:
.* 10,970 observations (17%) dont have any Identifications at all
.* 7,026 observations (11%) are casual grade (planted/captive or missing information)
.* 24,247 observations (37%) have an ID but need it refined or confirmed.
.* 22,515 observations (35%) are Research Grade.
Add a Comment