See my reasoning in detail here: https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/43429-Cebus/taxonomy_details but, in short, these updates don't really make sense unless the entire group (e.g. the rest of Cebus albifrons and also Cebus capucinus and Cebus olivaceus are all updated entirely together and
we don't have the information to do this yet.
cc @bobby23@jwidness
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Hi @duarte, how do you feel about swapping this back into Cebus albifrons ssp. versicolor
and the same for
Cebus malitiosus/Cebus albifrons ssp. malitiosus https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/15249
Cebus cuscinus/Cebus albifrons ssp. cuscinus https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/15508
Cebus cesarae/Cebus albifrons ssp. cesarae https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/15518
Cebus aequatorialis/Cebus albifrons ssp. aequatorialis https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/14894
See my reasoning in detail here: https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/43429-Cebus/taxonomy_details
but, in short, these updates don't really make sense unless the entire group (e.g. the rest of Cebus albifrons and also Cebus capucinus and Cebus olivaceus are all updated entirely together and
we don't have the information to do this yet.
cc @bobby23 @jwidness