How many individuals did you observe?
Observation | Count |
---|---|
Photos / SoundsObserverstephen_thorpeDescriptionTitirangi, Auckland. Associated with rotten wood, on the ground, in native bush, near the Park Rd entrance to Zigzag Track, Atkinson Park. |
1 |
3 | |
2 | |
3 | |
Photos / SoundsWhatGlaucocharis elainaObserverstephen_thorpeDescriptionTitirangi Village, Auckland. |
1 |
WhatAntipodean Ladybird (Harmonia antipoda)Observerstephen_thorpeDescriptionTitirangi Village, Auckland. |
1 |
6 | |
3 | |
2 | |
55 additional in area | |
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
1 | |
WhatRed Admiral (Vanessa atalanta)ObserverjuliereidPlacerare Charitable Research Reserve, Thompson Tract Waterloo Regional Municipality, ON, Canada (Google, OSM) |
5 |
WhatAmerican Lady (Vanessa virginiensis)ObserverjuliereidPlacerare Charitable Research Reserve, Thompson Tract Waterloo Regional Municipality, ON, Canada (Google, OSM) |
1 |
6 | |
2 | |
5 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
@loarie: I sent a message to the other "count" field creator, but they appear to be no longer active.
In some cases the system doesn't recognise there are two different fields by the same name, eg if you click on "View more search options" above you get taken to
"http://inaturalist.org/observations?field%3Acount="
If you do the same from the other "count" field you get taken to exactly the same (ie wrong) page.
So could you change the single project (mt-diablo-morgan-fire-2013) that is using the lowercase "count" field, to using this one, then we can merge the fields?
I have proposed merging the field "count" with this field "Count"
http://inaturalist.org/observation_fields/751
does anyone have any objection?